Information DesignSide Project · 2025–2026

careinsurance.info — Turning 500 Pages of Evidence Into a Public Resource

After personally fighting a 22-month health insurance dispute, I designed and built an advocacy site to help others navigate similar claims — with an interactive timeline, redacted correspondence vault, and structured consumer guidance.

The live site holds the full dispute documentation

This portfolio page covers the design and build. For the complete 11-step timeline, redacted emails, clinical evidence, and consumer takeaways, visit careinsurance.info.

careinsurance.info ↗

Problem

Over 22 months I fought a Care Health Insurance reimbursement claim — denied as "OPD-manageable" despite emergency pneumonia hospitalization. I accumulated 500+ pages of evidence, 33+ emails, and 60+ documents across grievance loops and an Insurance Ombudsman escalation. The claim ultimately settled at 96% (₹1,17,468).

Raw PDFs and email threads are unusable for stressed consumers researching their own disputes. I needed to turn that archive into a scannable, trustworthy, privacy-safe public resource — one that could help someone else avoid the same documentation loops.

"Insurance disputes run on paperwork fatigue. The site had to make 22 months of chaos navigable in under five minutes."

My Role

  • Claimant & author — fought the dispute, wrote all case content
  • Information architect — structured evidence into a linear, digestible narrative
  • UI designer — timeline UX, email mockups, metrics dashboard, redaction patterns
  • Developer — built and shipped careinsurance.info

Constraints

  • Privacy-first: All PII redacted before publish — names, policy IDs, phone numbers, and emails masked site-wide.
  • Not legal advice: Site documents one case and offers consumer guidance — not professional legal counsel.
  • Mobile-first: Stressed users research on phones; timeline must work on small screens without horizontal cramming.
  • Solo build: Designed, written, and developed by one person alongside an active dispute — scope had to stay focused.

Process

Information Architecture

I mapped the content into four layers, ordered by how quickly a visitor needs orientation vs. depth:

Layer 1Privacy notice & trust
Layer 2At-a-glance summary
Layer 3Key metrics
Layer 4Interactive timeline
Layer 5Consumer lessons

Layer 1 establishes credibility before any personal data appears. Layers 2–3 answer "what happened and how bad was it?" in under 30 seconds. Layer 4 is the deep dive — the correspondence vault. Layer 5 converts the experience into actionable guidance for other policyholders.

Key Design Decisions

Sidebar timeline + detail pane

A master–detail pattern keeps 11 milestones scannable on the left while correspondence loads on the right — avoiding endless scroll through mixed content types.

Email client mockups

Insurer replies are rendered as familiar inbox UI (sender avatar, timestamp, body) so template rejections read as real correspondence, not flat text blocks.

Semantic status badges

Danger (denials, loops) and win (Ombudsman settlement) states use color-coded timeline nodes — users can spot turning points without reading every entry.

PII redaction system

Names, policy IDs, phone numbers, and email addresses are visually redacted with dashed borders and a site-wide privacy notice — transparency without exposure.

Metrics at a glance

22 months, 500+ pages, 33+ emails — surfaced as scannable stat cards so the scale of the fight is immediately legible.

Mobile-first collapse

Timeline sidebar stacks above the detail pane on small screens, preserving the interaction model without horizontal cramming.

Component Preview — Timeline & Correspondence Vault

This is the core interaction I designed and built. Select a milestone to see how clinical events, insurer denials, and escalation steps are presented together. The live site includes all 11 steps with full redacted correspondence.

22+
Months
500+
Pages
33+
Emails
96%
Settlement
Metrics summary module — designed to communicate dispute scale before users commit to the full timeline.

Measured Outcome

11
Timeline milestones on live site
96%
Claim recovered via Ombudsman
100%
PII redacted before publish

What Changed Because of This Work

  • Personal: ₹1,17,468 settlement after Ombudsman escalation — dispute closed May 2026.
  • Product: Shipped careinsurance.info as a live, shareable resource for policyholders facing similar claim delays.
  • Design: Proved dense legal/medical content can be navigable with the right IA and interaction patterns — without sacrificing privacy or accuracy.
Read the full case on the live site

Complete timeline, all redacted insurer correspondence, clinical evidence summaries, and step-by-step consumer guidance.

Open careinsurance.info ↗